org.apache.tapestry5.corelib.components.Loop

Basic looping class; loops over a number of items (provided by its source parameter), rendering its body for each one. It turns out that gettting the component to not store its state in the Form is very tricky and, in fact, a series of commands for starting and ending heartbeats, and advancing through the iterator, are still stored. For a non-volatile Loop inside the form, the Loop stores a series of commands that start and end heartbeats and store state (either as full objects when there the encoder parameter is not bound, or as client-side objects when there is an encoder).

[JavaDoc]

Component Parameters

NameTypeFlagsDefaultDefault PrefixDescription
elementStringNOT Allow NullliteralThe element to render. If not null, then the loop will render the indicated element around its body (on each pass through the loop). The default is derived from the component template.
emptyBlockNOT Allow NullliteralA Block to render instead of the loop when the source is empty. The default is to render nothing.
encoderPrimaryKeyEncoderNOT Allow NullpropOptional primary key converter; if provided and inside a form and not volatile, then each iterated value is converted and stored into the form.
indexintNOT Allow NullpropThe index into the source items.
sourceIterableRequired, NOT Allow NullpropDefines the collection of values for the loop to iterate over. If not specified, defaults to a property of the container whose name matches the Loop cmponent's id.
valueObjectNOT Allow NullpropThe current value, set before the component renders its body.
volatilebooleanNOT Allow NullpropIf true and the Loop is enclosed by a Form, then the normal state saving logic is turned off. Defaults to false, enabling state saving logic within Forms.

Informal parameters: supported

Basic Example

This example is based around a NavBar component that generates a set of links to other pages in the applilcation.

NavBar.tml

<table class="navigation" xmlns:t="http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd">

   <tr>
        <t:loop source="pageNames" value="pageName">
            <td class="${tabClass}">
                <t:pagelink page="pageName">${pageName}</t:pagelink>
            </td>
        </t:loop>
    </tr>

</table>

We are assuming that the NavBar component has a pageNames property (possibly a parameter). The Loop will iterate over those page names and store each into its value parameter.

NavBar.java

public class NavBar
{
    @Parameter(defaultPrefix="literal", required=true)
    private String pages;

    @Inject
    private ComponentResources resources;

    @Property
    private String _pageName;

    public String[] getPageNames()
    {
        return pages.split(",");
    }

    public String getTabClass()
    {
        if (pageName.equalsIgnoreCase(resources.getPageName())
            return "current";

        return null;
    }
}

The component converts its pages parameter into the pageNames property by splitting it at the commas. It tracks the current pageName of the loop not just to generate the links, but to calculate the CSS class of each <td> element on the fly. This way we can give the tab corresponding to the current page a special look or highlight.

Invisible Instrumentation

We can fold together the Loop component and the <td> element:

NavBar.tml

<table class="navigation" xmlns:t="http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd">

   <tr>
        <td t:type="loop" source="pageNames" value="pageName" class="${tabClass}">
            <t:pagelink page="pageName">${pageName}</t:pagelink>
        </td>
    </tr>

</table>

Using the t:type="loop" attribute, the other way to identify a template element as a component, allows the Loop component to render the element's tag, the <td> on each iteration, along with informal parameters (the class attribute). This is calledinvisible instrumentation, and it is more concise and more editor/preview friendly than Tapestry's typical markup.

Forms and Loops Example

Tapestry form control element components (TextField, etc.) work inside loops. However, some additional configuration is needed to make this work efficiently.

With no extra configuration, each value object will be serialized into the form (if you view the rendered markup, you'll see a hidden form field containing serialized data needed by Tapestry to process the form). This can become very bloated, or may not work if the objects being iterated are not serializable.

The typical case is database driven; you are editting objects from a database and need those objects back when the form is submitted. All that should be stored on the client is the ids of those objects. Thats what the encoder parameter is for.

EditOrder.tml

<html xmlns:t="http://tapestry.apache.org/schema/tapestry_5_0_0.xsd">
    <body>

        <h1>Edit Order Quantities</h1>

        <t:form>

            <t:errors/>

            <t:loop source="items" value="item" encoder="encoder">
                <div class="line-item">
                    <t:label for="quantity">${item.product.name}</t:label>
                    <t:textfield t:id="quantity" value="item.quantity"/>
                </div>
            </t:loop>

            <input type="submit" value="Update"/>
        </t:form>
    </body>
</html>

The TextField component is rendered multiple times, once for each LineItem in the Order.

EditOrder.java

public class EditOrder
{
    @Inject
    private OrderDAO orderDAO;

    @Property
    private final PrimaryKeyEncoder<Long,LineItem> encoder = new PrimaryKeyEncoder<Long,LineItem>()
    {
        public Long toKey(LineItem value) { return value.getId(); }

        public void prepareForKeys(List<Long> keys) { }

        public LineItem toValue(Long key)
        {
            return orderDAO.getLineItem(key);
        }
    };

    @Persist
    private long orderId;

    @Property
    private LineItem item;

    public List<LineItem> getItems()
    {
        return orderDAO.getLineItemsForOrder(orderId);
    }
}

Here, we expect the OrderDAO service to do most of the work, and we create a wrapper around it, in the form of the PrimeryKeyEncoder instance.

We've glossed over a few issues here, including how to handle the case that a particular item has been deleted or changed between the render request and the form submission, as well as how the orderId property gets set in the first place.

Accounting for those situations would largely be encapsulated inside the PrimeryKeyEncoder instance.


Back to index